中國成文法起源辨析

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 文學院 > 史學系暨研究所 > 學報-華岡史學 > Item 987654321/32268

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/32268

題名:	中國成文法起源辨析 An Analysis of the Origin of Statutory Law of China
作者:	黎明昌 Li, Ming-Chung
貢獻者:	史學所
關鍵詞:	成文法梁啟超沈家本九刑西周 Statutory law Liang Qichao Shen Jiaben Nine criminal Western Zhou Dynast
日期:	2013-12-01
上傳時間:	2016-03-21 10:39:42 (UTC+8)
摘要:	自晚清梁啟超發表《論中國成文法編制之沿革得失》一文，其中論及中國成文法之起源後，引起波瀾，蕩漾於今，各式各樣的異說隨之而起。關於時代方面，有認為上古唐虞時期即有成文法，以下的殷商、西周、春秋、戰國、乃迄秦代皆有人立論支持。在證據上，各家學者對於成文法的定義不一，如成文法公開與否、是判例法或是制定法、私法或是國家立法、單行法或是綜合性法典與罪行法定的確立與否並沒有共識，以致人言人殊，莫衷一是的狀況。本文擬將整理各家不同之定義，蒐羅備列，嘗試探求其共同定義。並將所能接觸到的資料加以考證、比勘，以辨析中國成文法之起源可能於西周之時的《九刑》。 Since Liang Qichao published his ＂On the Pros and Cons of Statutory Law of China＂ at the end of Qing Dynasty, there has been a plethora of discussion on the origin of statutory law. There is a temporal issue. Some scholars believed that statutory law had already originated from in the ancient Yu/Tang Period. However, some other scholars advocated that it should appear later until the Shang Dynasty, the West Zhou Dynasty, the Spring and Autumn Period, the Warring States Period, or the Qin Dynasty. Those diverse opinions about such temporal issue were produced due to the diverse definitions of statutory law. For example, is it a public or a private law? A case law or national legislation? A special enactment or a code of law? Dose it correspond to nulla poena sine lege? Since there is no consensus about those disputes, scholars still have various opinions. This thesis aims to collect those diverse definitions and compare their similarities, and then plans to find a common definition. It will verify the sources and explain all the materials. Conclusively, I will propose that the ＂Nine Punishments＂ in the Western Zhou Dynasty is the origin of statutory law in China.
關聯:	華岡史學； 1期 (2013 / 12 / 01) ， P1 - 23
顯示於類別:	[史學系暨研究所] 學報-華岡史學

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
index.html		0Kb	HTML	412	檢視/開啟

檢視Licence

在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

資料載入中.....