文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/31933
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 47225/51091 (92%)
Visitors : 14003172      Online Users : 218
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/31933


    Title: 偵查階段辯護權之研究
    A Study of Criminal Defendant’s Right to Counsel during the Period of Investigation
    Authors: 房彥輝
    Fang, Yen-Huei
    Contributors: 法律學系
    Keywords: 被告及犯罪嫌疑人
    辯護人
    辯護權
    受律師協助權
    警詢程序
    武器平等
    Criminal defendants and suspects
    Defender
    Defense rights
    Right to counsel
    Police Interrogation Program
    Equality of arms
    Date: 2016-01-13
    Issue Date: 2016-01-27 11:09:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 犯罪嫌疑人面臨國家司法機關以各種方式或姿態呈現時,很有可能處於無助的地位,實有需要利用辯護人制度,尤其是被拘提或逮捕到場或受羈押之被告或犯罪嫌疑人,其人身自由受拘束之情形下,得以和一般人身自由未受拘束之人得行使之防禦權有所不同,為免其該等權利受減損,確保與檢、警機關之當事人對等,並且保障人民受憲法保障之訴訟權,以有效保障刑事程序上之權利。本文認為,辯護權或律師權於刑事程序中,應有探討如何適用之必要性,尤其是在對人權剝奪可能較為嚴重的偵查中之警詢程序,遂從刑事辯護制度之概論出發,探討辯護制度之發展史、辯護人之程序地位、辯護制度之目的及內涵,並追尋其憲法基礎與法律依據,再回到本文所關心的偵查階段,辯護權應如何適用且落實之問題,並聚焦於偵查中警詢程序之辯護人在場權,提出本文之見解與未來改革方向之建議。
    本論文從比較法上的角度,介紹各國辯護制度之發展概況,並與我國之辯護制度發展情形為相對照,接續則介紹並分析各種學理上關於辯護人地位之理論、辯護制度之目的及內涵,以及之實質有效辯護之概念,並歸納本章有關辯護制度之概論內涵,予以統整分析。
    辯護制度的憲法基礎之部分,則介紹美國聯邦憲法之規定及聯邦最高法院判決以及日本憲法之規定,以及我國憲法之規定及釋憲實務上大法官解釋之闡述。而辯護制度的法律依據,即除了具有前述之憲法基礎外,尚有其相關法律依據。
    本論文欲探討之核心,即偵查中的辯護權,首先概述偵查之概念以及偵查中之實質辯護,並切入偵查中訊問時辯護人之在場權之相關問題點,先探討在場權之概念與功能,並將重心擺在偵查中訊問時辯護人之在場權,尤其是警詢階段之辯護人在場辯護權之基礎以及如何保障?應如何有效落實實質辯護?在場權之行使方式以及現行制度有何缺失?最後並提出本文之改善建議。最後並針對全文內容予以歸納統整、分析,提出本文之觀點作為結論
    Suspect countries facing the judiciary in a variety of ways or posture when presented, is likely to be in a helpless position, there is a need to use the defender system, especially by Criminal Responsibility or arrested by the defendant or the presence or detention of suspects, the case is bound by its liberty, the right to defense and the general liberty of the people have to exercise restraint were not vary, in order to avoid its such rights by derogation to ensure that the inspection, the police authorities of the party on the other, and guarantee People affected by constitutional guarantees of the right of action to effectively protect the rights of criminal procedure on. This paper argues that the right of defense or the right to counsel in criminal proceedings, should discuss how to apply the necessity, particularly in human rights deprivation may be more serious investigation of the police inquiry procedure, then starting from the introduction of the criminal defense system, defense system Discussion The history, defenders of the status of the program, the purpose and meaning of the defense system, and to pursue its constitutional and legal basis for the foundation, and then return to this article concerned the investigation stage, how to apply the right of defense and implementation of the issue, and focus on the investigation of the police Defenders of the present exercise program right, suggestions and opinions of the article of the future direction of reform.
    In this paper, from the perspective of comparative law, introduce the development of the defense system of the States before, and with the development of the defense system of our country's situation is in contrast, continue the presentation and analysis of various doctrinal theories about the status of the defender, purpose and meaning of the defense system, as well as the essence of the concept of an effective defense, and summarizes the connotation about the defense system of the introduction of this chapter, shall integration analysis.
    Part of the constitutional basis of the defense system, the introduction describes the provisions of the Federal Constitution and the Supreme Court judgment and the provisions of the Constitution of Japan, as well as provisions of our Constitution and Justice interpretation of the substantive constitutional interpretation. The legal basis of the defense system, which in addition to having the constitutional basis of the foregoing, there are its legal basis.
    In this paper, I want to explore the core, that is the investigation of the right to defense, first outlined the concept of the defense as well as the substance of the investigation of the investigation, and the presence of cut-related problems when defender Right investigation interrogation, the first to explore the concept of the right of the presence and function the presence of the right to counsel, and the center of gravity of the pendulum in the investigation of the interrogation, the police inquiry stage, especially the presence of counsel basis of the right to defense and how to protect? how effective implementation of the substance of the defense? the presence of the right of way and the exercise of the existing system in place missing? Finally, this paper put forward recommendations for improvement. Finally, and for the full text to be summarized Integration, analysis, make a point of the conclusion of this article.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML313View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback