文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/30951
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46965/50831 (92%)
Visitors : 12628002      Online Users : 347
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/30951


    Title: 王陽明「知行合一」的再研議
    A Revaluation of Wang Yang Ming's "Zhi Hsin He Yi"
    Authors: 蔡龍九
    Tsai, Lung-Chiu
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 知行合一
    一念發動處
    重行
    有意義的知行
    "Zhi Hsin He Yi" (the unity of cognition and practice)
    "Yi Nian Fa Dong Chu" (the point when the concept arises)
    "Chong Hsin" (emphasizing the practice)
    the meaningful "Zhi Hsin"
    Date: 2013-10
    Issue Date: 2015-11-16 09:59:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文欲釐清王陽明論述「知行合一」時的細部可議之處。當代前輩學者們曾針對此「知行合一」問題提出多種看法,包含留意到「一念發動處」是否適用於「知行合一」的教法。陳來先生針對此處提出「重行」之說,而李明輝先生則以「意念屬行」的方式來解消此糾葛……等。針對前輩學者們的研究成果,筆者欲補充說明有關「知行合一」與「意念」細部關聯,並在陽明所認同的「知行合一」架構下,重新論說「善念」、「惡念」是否屬「行」的問題,並針對前述兩位前輩學者的看法做出調和,且回歸陽明論說「知行合一」時的主要涵義。
    I will focus upon the arguments of Wang Yang Ming's theory of ”Zhi Hsin He Yi”(知行合一) in this paper. Concerning this issue, scholars have proposed various interpretations, pondering whether ”Yi Nian Fa Dong Chu” (一念發動處) is applicable to ”Zhi Hsin He Yi.” For instance, Chen Lai accentuates ”Chong Hsin” (重行) and argues that ”Yi Nian Fa Dong Chu” is not applicable to ”Zhi Hang He Yi.” Besides Li Ming Hui suggests that ”Yi Nian”(意念) is also an ”act” in ”Zhi Hsin He Yi” so as to solve the entanglement. Inspired by these researches, I intend to analyze the intricate relationship between ”Zhi Hang He Yi” and ”Yi Nian.” Furthermore, I will reevaluate whether ”Shan Nian”(善念) and ”Er Nian”(惡念) can be categorized as an ”act” in Wang Yang Ming's theoretical framework. Finally, I attempt to assimilate the arguments proposed by Chen Lai and Li Ming Hui while returning to the core principle of Wang Yang Ming's ”Zhi Hsin He Yi.”
    Relation: 國立臺灣大學哲學論評 ; 46期 (2013 / 10 / 01) , P121 - 155
    Appears in Collections:[Philosophy Department and Graduate School] journal articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML219View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback