文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/30652
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 46962/50828 (92%)
造访人次 : 12408854      在线人数 : 1271
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/30652


    题名: 唐君毅論朱熹與王陽明互補之成德工夫
    Tang Jun-Yi on the Ju Xi's and Wang Yang-Ming's Mutually Complementary Theories about Moral Accomplishment
    作者: 曾春海
    Tseng, Chun-Hai
    贡献者: 哲學系
    关键词: 唐君毅
    王陽明
    朱熹
    格物致知
    成德之教
    居敬窮理
    致良知
    感通
    《大學》
    工夫
    Tang Jun-yi
    Wang Yang-ming
    Ju Xi
    Studying the Phenomena of Nature to Acquire Knowledge
    Moral Accomplishment
    Staying in Quiet Reverence to thoroughly
    Achieve the Heavenly Principle
    Realizing the Innate Good
    Correspondence
    "Great Learning"
    Cultivation
    日期: 2014-02-01
    上传时间: 2015-10-28 13:04:45 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 唐君毅立基於黑格爾的辯證哲學,且認為中國哲學有深刻的內在慧命相續。因此,他持此一立場來論述朱熹與王陽明在成德工夫上各盡其長、互補其短的可能性。本文企求從唐先生整體學思出發,一方面由朱子、王陽明的各別文本中梳理,釐清兩人分據「性即理」(朱子)、「心即理」(王陽明)的道德人性論立基點,注意兩人對心之本質屬性和功能作用之不同詮釋,揀別出兩人成德工夫之特質、理論之卓越處和侷限點,再進而細緻的研讀唐君毅對朱熹心性實踐工夫之詮釋與批判,以及辨析出他對陽明致良知教的理解、詮釋、評價,且進而建設性地提出他個人認為陽明致良知教可以補足朱子居敬窮理的格物踐德之不足處。
    Based on Hege's dialectic philosophy and convinced in the internal profound continuity of wisdom in Chinese philosophy, Tang Jun-yi investigated how it's possible for Ju Xi and Wang Yang-ming to show their respective strengths and complement each other's weaknesses. Here we approach Ju's and Wang's texts through Tang's perspective to clarify their respective theories of ”nature as principle” (Ju) and ”mind as principle” (Wang) as the foundations of their doctrine on moral humanity, focus on their different interpretations on the attributes and functions of mind, differentiate their respective strengths and limits in terms of the attributes and theories of moral accomplishment. Then, we will further elaborate on how Tang interpreted and criticized Ju's practice of mind-nature, analyzed Tang's understanding, interpretation, evaluation of Wang's realization of innate good and then constructively pointed out how Wang's theory of the ”realization of innate good” could have complemented the weaknesses of Ju's theories of ”studying the phenomena of nature” and ”practice of morality”.
    關聯: 哲學與文化 ; 41卷2期 (2014 / 02 / 01) , P33 - 47
    显示于类别:[哲學系暨研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML213检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈