創新的發明及技術帶領人們進入一個前所未見的世代，國家面對風險社會中潛在的眾多不確定情 況，在正向運用科技所帶來的影響與成果的同時，亦需思索將其可能招致之負面效應，有效防範風險 轉變為實害，於此，國家的功能與定位應如何由傳統法治國原則下所強調之依法行政重新調整，以適 當回應伴隨而來的衝擊與問題，應屬現代國家無法迴避的重要課題。本研究首先將探討預防性干預行 政與基本權利保障體系及國家保護義務之關連，及其在風險社會下之演繹，同時關注行政法學在面對 風險之調控行為，應如何承接憲法所保障之價值與託付之任務，為預防性干預行政提供完善之基礎架 構；進而，關注預防性干預行政於警察行政法與食品行政法中之轉變與崛起，考量各個領域之特性， 嘗試明確區分不同類型之應用要件；然而，由於預防性措施的採行本身即有風險，故如何建置相關配 套機制，適度舒解其預防特質可能帶來之法律上之緊張關係，強化其正當性，亦為本研究探究之重心， 並期待得透過上述研究提供國家建構預防性干預行政法制時之參考。 Innovative inventions and techniques have guided humans into an era unseen, while States faces many unpredictable circumstances in a risk society. When we take advantage of the positive impact and result of technology, the possible negative impact should also be taken into consideration at the same time, in order to prevent possible risk from turning into danger. Therefore, how to readjust the feature and status of the State from the traditional Principle of Rule of Law’s, which highlight on Principle of Legality, should be carefully considered, to respond to the impacts and issues accompanied by developing technology. This is also an inevitable task that modern states shall face. This research will firstly discuss the relationships between Precautionary Interference Administration, the protection of fundamental right and state’s obligation to protect. When administrative law faces risk, how action of regulation will be implemented, and how these action will correspond with the missions confide in the constitution and its value, to provide a fundamental framework for the Precautionary Interference Administration, will also be discussed. Furthermore this study will focus on the transformation and rise of Preventive Interference Administration in Traditional Police Administrative Law and the Newly-Developed Food Administration Law. This study will take into account the characteristic in different fields and try to distinguish the criteria in different categorization. Because preventive measure itself contains risk, therefore, how to establish corresponding measures to ease the tension to the legal system caused by preventive measure, and to strengthen its legality, is what this research will focus upon. Hopefully, this study can provide some reference when the State establishes a preventive interference administration system of law.
