2014年3月18日「太陽花學運」，我國大學生與部分公民團體佔領立法院、攻擊行政院等事件，爆發此一憲政危機的導火線在於立法院審理「臺灣海峽兩岸服務貿易協議」過於輕率，協議條約文本如附件一所示，同時相關群眾亦認為行政官僚系統黑箱作業，背離民意。
從決策過程的視角切入，上開係屬「官僚理性選擇決策模式」運作之結果。如果說「理性選擇」是所有人的共識，為什麼存在於菁英政治下的行政官僚依據理性選擇理論所做出的決策，得不到國內人民的認同？本文以「海峽兩岸服務貿易協議」為例，除從官僚理性選擇決策過程中發現行政官僚忽略決策行動者意識形態、欠缺制度規範考量、狹隘利益衡量等三項變項要素外，更進一步說明行政官僚政策決策僅考量交易成本之後果。
本研究並發現整體系統脈絡已經改變：一、意識形態兩極對立轉化為多元融合；二、制度單純簡明建構為複雜重疊；三、利益單一明確發展為交錯模糊，身處於此一全新變革系統中的行政官僚便不能再以舊思維去思考新世界的政策走向。展望未來，政府決策行動者於決策時應運用加入意識形態、制度、利益之理性選擇理論，制訂出更符合人民期待之決策。
Generally speaking, decision-making is included motivation and process.Motivation is the decision makers contexts where and the process is the actual execution of the decision-makers of situation.
This paper focuses on Taiwan's "Cross-Strait Agreement on Trade in Services' decision-making process", in order to" bureaucratic rational choice decision model "for the study of ways to analyze the variables in the decision-making process and describe future decision-makers in the direction of Taiwan.
In the other way, Research found that the overall system enviroment has changed: First, ideoloical polar opposites into Amalgamation; Second, the system simply constructed become complex; Third, the interests of clear and single development to fuzzy staggered.
living in this new system, the administrator of bureaucratic have to change which can not use about the older rational choice model at the new world.
In the future, the governmemt decision of bureaucratic should apply to the rational decision-making ideology, system and the interests, to develop more policy with people’s expectations.
