文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/29890
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46965/50831 (92%)
Visitors : 12650920      Online Users : 487
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/29890


    Title: 示威是否會毀壞國家的經濟? 泰國股市之實證研究
    Have the Demonstrations Ruined the Country Economy: An Evidence fromThailand Stock Market Exchange (SET)
    Authors: 李雯
    Tauvarodama, Benchawan
    Contributors: 財務金融學系
    Keywords: Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET)
    EGARCH
    demonstrations
    political risk
    stock volatilities
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-07-08 15:21:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Political risk is the important determinant for stock price in emerging country
    than in developed country, Diamonte et al, (1996). Thailand, one of the emerging
    markets in South East Asia, has been faced with the problem of political demonstrations
    for years. The political unrest has already hit tourism and related industries, shaken
    public confidence in major government-support project such as mass transit expansion
    as well as impact investor and consumer’s confidence. This research is devoted to
    examine whether the demonstration really caused negative impact to stock market, and
    which demonstrations impact to the stock market most. This study sample uses daily
    data from Stock Exchange of Thailand ranged from 2008 to 2015 covered three major
    political change groups by employing EGARCH model. From the empirical result, the
    first demonstration under group of People's Alliance for Democracy(PAD) caused
    negative return and increase volatilities to the market significantly a 1% level. The second
    demonstration (UDD) had no effect to the return but increased volatilities at 5% significant
    level. Last, the third demonstration (PDRC) had no effect to both market return and volatilities.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Banking & Finance ] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML192View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback