| 摘要: | 都市隨著時間及經濟發展而擴張，其影響也改變了原來都市中原有的空間結構，鄰避設施（NIMBY Facility）的設置依都市計畫應是配置於人口密度較低之都市郊區或邊緣地區，但都市經歷發展擴張後，過去位處都市邊緣的鄰避設施，這些設施在今日的區位卻不一定是適當的。
故本研究以選定研究範圍內之鄰避設施與當地社區居民間互動關係為研究主題，試圖找出管理機關在設施設置後與當地社區居民間之互動模式，並去了解設施管理機關的現行睦鄰措施是否符合民眾期待，進而提出鄰避設施往後經營社區關係的建議，以期將有助於鄰避設施設置區位問題之改善。
為達前述研究目的，本研究內容共分六章廿七節，第一章利用舉證方式說明研究動機與目的，研究方法、流程做為接續研究基礎，選定以松山機場及第一殯儀館作為探討對象，並以兩設施周邊之行仁里、行孝里、行政里等三里為進行實證調查社區；第二章以論證方式透過文獻回顧歸納出居民環境意識組成因素，經由第三章與第四章之實地調查及訪談，瞭解現行睦鄰措施及社區居民感受、反應與意向，最後透過第五章之實證分析進行議題及課題分析；第六章則以研究結果提出因應對策，及研究心得提出結論與建議。
研究結果得知，在長期受到松山機場及第一殯儀館等設施之多種層面的負面影響下，再加上兩設施管理單位在態度上並未有效積極面對處理問題，以致既使有回饋金制度的實施，近70%左右的社區居民不支持松山機場繼續營運，而第一殯儀館則是約90%的社區居民表示不支持繼續營運。另外，「機場回饋金管理執行小組」與「殯儀館回饋地方經費管理委員會」等單位目前已流於進行形式會議，失去當初設立之初衷目的與效果，有立即檢討並調整組織架構之必要。回饋金使用項目在資本門及經常門的比例分配上，執行者(里長)均反應映出已經產生資源上的浪費及執行上的困擾，因而導致未能有效執行以因應社區及居民之需要。故整體睦鄰回饋制度勢有重新修訂之必要。
Cities expand as a result of economic development, which has impacts on the spatial structures. Not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) facilities were originally allocated and established in cities’ edges, as cities expand over time, these facilities gradually becomes sitting in the city and some are even in the core areas. As a consequence, locations of these NIMBY facilities become inappropriate.
This research focuses on the interactive relationship between NIMBY facilities and local communities in a chosen area, and intends to find out the interactive patterns between managerial agencies and local communities. Moreover, it intends to understand the extent to which local communities are satisfactory about the actions managerial agencies undertake to ease the tension between two sides. In doing so, this research wishes to offer suggestions for managerial agencies in terms of the management of relationships with local communities that helps to ease the problems about the establishment of NIMBY facilities.
In order to accomplish the objectives of this research, there are six chapters and 27 sections in this dissertation. Chapter One explains motivation and objectives through examples. Following by research methods and procedures, this research uses the Taipei Songshan Airport and the First Funeral Parlor of the Taipei Mortuary Services as NIMBY case studies, and chooses three neighbors, namely Shingren、Shingshiau、Shingjeng ,Zhongshan Districts, to undertake experimental studies. Chapter Two presents literature review of factors of local residents’ environmental awareness. Chapter Three and Four reveal research methods, designs and implementation in order to understand local residents’ feelings, responses and attitudes towards actions which managerial agencies take to mitigate the inconvenience and discomfort NIMBY facilities currently cause. Chapter Five analyses the experiment results through a series well-structured dialectical issues. Finally, Chapter Six presents the outcomes of this research, provides recommedations on issues, and offers suggestions for further researches.
According to the results, the long-lasting negative impacts which the Taipei Songshan Airport and the First Funeral Parlor of the Taipei Mortuary Services cause, as well as the managerial agencies’ passive attitudes towards dealing with these issues and local communities, roughly 70% of local residents do not support the continuation of operation of two facilities’ services, in which 90% of local residents against the First Funeral Parlor of the Taipei Mortuary Services in particular. In addition, the Management and Executive Team of Airport Compensation Fund and the Management Committee of the Funeral Parlor Compensation Fund have become formality and lost the intention when they were established. The usage of both compensation funds often has difficulties in the bureaucratic processes which results in losses and waste in resources and obstacles in implementation. As a consequence, local residents’ needs are not met that points out a need to reform the compensation system. |
