文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/29863
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46962/50828 (92%)
Visitors : 12441366      Online Users : 751
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/29863


    Title: 不同處理系統的人工濕地生命週期評估
    Life Cycle Assessment of Three Differently Treated Constructed Wetland Systems in New Taipei City
    Authors: 阮翠圓明
    Contributors: 地學研究所地理組
    Keywords: constructed wetland
    life cycle assessment (LCA)
    municipal wastewater
    biological treatment
    subsurface flow system
    Dahan River
    Date: 2015-06
    Issue Date: 2015-07-07 15:14:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The study applied Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of construction, operation, transportation of materials and wastes among the gravel contact oxidation system in Yingge, constructed wetland in Chenglin and constructed wetland in Xinhai 3. The aim of Life Cycle Assessment was to assess the environment benefits of wetland was used as a wastewater treatment plant and the usefulness of converting waste land into biological treatment plant. Two methods Impact 2002+ and ReCiPe were applied to the similarities and differences between them.
    The results are similar from all two methods with dominance of waste scenario at all categories in regard to either of projects (Chenglin, Yingge, Xinhai 3). There are a few differences in results of two methods but no importance fluctuation. Any significant changes in the results might be influenced by the study uncertainties. Apparently, both methods bring similar results on human health category. Two methods indicate different indicators (terrestrial ecotoxicity in Impact 2002 and natural land transformation in ReCiPe) at midpoint but both guide to the same endpoint (ecosystem quality). Furthermore, in comparison with human health and resources, ecosystem quality suffers hardly from those impacts, almost double or triple. Nevertheless, in spite of constructing in the similar ways or using similar methods, they are some difference in their effects to the environment.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Geography & Graduate Institute of Earth Science / Geography ] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML485View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback