| 摘要: | 中國迴避制度從東漢正式建立，南北朝普遍實行，唐、宋時期日趨嚴密，到清代，已經形成包括職務迴避、地區迴避、公務迴避在內之完整之迴避制度。但迴避制度發展到現在，隨著兩岸地區政治制度之不同，各自發展出不同特色之迴避制度，迴避制度在兩岸這樣注重人情社會具有特殊意義，完善公務員迴避制度十分必要。從世界範圍來看，大部分國家都有關於公務員迴避制度之有關規定，並且基本成熟，例如美國、德國、西班牙、葡萄牙等，隨著實務界關於利益衝突問題之研究深入以及國際、兩岸廉政建設之發展，公職人員利益衝突規避之問題越來越得到政府、學者以及公眾之關注，同時越來越多之人把公職人員利益衝突作為腐敗最重要之根源之一，認為有效之管理與防止利益衝突是治理腐敗之根源性策略。實際上，公職人員利益衝突不僅會引起腐敗之發生，還會導致公共政策之偏失、公眾對政府信任度下降等一系列問題。因此，對公職人員利益衝突問題之研究十分必要，另一方面針對兩岸國情不同，同一制度實行起來卻有不同得評價效果，兩岸之迴避制度，究竟有何差異，為本文主要探討問題。
Chinese avoidance system from the formal establishment of the Eastern Han Dynasty, Northern and Southern general practice, Tang and Song Dynasties increasingly tight, to the Qing Dynasty, has been formed, including duties evaded areas to avoid, evade official, including a complete avoidance system. But avoidance system to the present, with different regions on both sides of the political system, each developed different characteristics avoidance system, avoidance system on both sides of so much attention to human society has a special meaning, it is necessary to improve the civil service avoidance system. From a global perspective, most countries have provisions on civil avoidance system, and ripe, such as the United States, Spain, Portugal, etc., with practitioners depth study on the issue of conflict of interest, as well as international, cross-strait development and clean government conflicts of interest of public officials to circumvent the problem has been more government, academics and the public＇s attention, while more and more people to a conflict of interest of public officials as one of the most important root causes of corruption that effective management and prevention of conflicts of interest is the roots of controlling corruption strategy. In fact, the conflict of interest of public officials will not only lead to the occurrence of corruption, but also lead Deviation public policy, public trust in government decreased and other issues. Therefore, the research on the issue of conflict of interest of public officials is necessary, on the other hand for different conditions on both sides of the same system, the implementation of it has a different effect was evaluated, both sides avoidance system, what exactly the difference, as the paper mainly discusses the problem of |
