於探討「宅向有無吉凶與養生」的史料裡，現存最早僅魏晉嵇康與阮德如二人以論辯形式來闡述二者的關係。這個議題在風水學上雖只是眾多問題當中的一環，卻也關連到多數人對宅是否帶來吉凶禍福？是否為迷信的關鍵所在？而嵇康二人於魏晉玄學盛行時，採取此種論辯方式來討論，確實令人產生破除迷障的效果。在魏晉時期阮德如的〈宅無吉凶攝生論：論上〉、〈釋難宅無吉凶攝生論：難中〉與嵇康〈難宅無吉凶攝生論〉、〈答釋難宅無吉凶攝生論〉等四篇文章乃今僅存最早採取論辯形式所論述風水議題的文獻，故本文將針對此四篇以論辯形式所產生的內容進行文本分析，且進一步探討宅之吉凶與居住者的養生關係，並希望能釐清宅之吉凶是否為迷信行為。
The discussion of Fengshui in the historical documents, the oldest and only is the discourse the relationship between ＂Yangzhai whether good or bad fortune and occupants health＂ by Ji-Kang and Ruan-Deru in Wei Jin Dynasty. This issue is a part of many problems in Fengshui theory, it is also the key to most people connected to judge that ＂Yangzhai whether good or bad fortune＂ is superstitious or not. In the prevalence of Wei Jin Metaphysics, Ji-Kang’s argument indeed have the effect of break maze; the discourse in the dialogue process also produce special interested discussion. This article analyzes four discussion between Ruan-Deru and Ji-Kang with the issue of ＂Yangzhai whether good or bad fortune, and the relation to Yangzhai and occupants health.＂ I hope to clarify the relationship and serendipity of Yangzhai whether good or bad fortune and occupants health.
