文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/28732
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 47249/51115 (92%)
造访人次 : 14095313      在线人数 : 501
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/28732


    题名: 鋰電池之累積充電能量的二次高斯函數模型
    Using a Quadratic Gaussian Function to Describe the Accumulated Charging Energy of a Lithium-Ion Battery
    作者: 林庭笙
    翁志祁
    贡献者: 華岡工程學報
    关键词: 鋰離子電池
    二次高斯函數
    電池充電能量
    瓦特-小時
    電池組態
    Lithium-ion battery
    quadratic Gaussian function
    battery charge energy
    watt-hours
    battery configuration
    日期: 2011-01
    上传时间: 2014-10-31 14:36:14 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 此研究提供一個模型來模擬鋰離子電池的充電行為,以預測充電過程中所累積的能量(瓦特-小時)。它是以二次高斯函數和一個極限值來預測電池的能量。在以來自兩個不同製造商的電池組合成兩個三串二並的電池組,各在常溫及低溫的環境下模擬。所得到模型的表現與實際樣本的累積能量的比較,常溫下平均誤差各為0.29%及0.22%,最大誤差為0.67%。低溫下平均誤差各為0.47%及0.36%,最大誤差則為1.15%。由此可知,本模型可以有效描述並預測鋰離子電池的充電累積能量。而此模型比較適合模擬常溫下的電池行為,在低溫下會有比較大的誤差,但仍在可接受的範圍之內。另再以一個四串一並的電池在常溫下模擬,平均誤差為0.30%,最大誤差也在0.76%之內。未來將研究更多不同廠商、不同的組態、在不同的溫度下的充電行為,讓本模型更為周延。
    This study provided a model to simulate the behavior of lithium-ion batteries and predicted the accumulated energy (watt - hours) at charging process. It is formed by a limit value and a quadratic Gaussian function. Two 3S2P battery packs, from two different manufacturers, operated at room temperature and low temperature are studied. The performance of this model is satisfactory. At room temperature, the average energy differences between our model and the actual data are 0.29% and 0.22%. The maximum difference of these two is 0.67%. At low temperature, the average energy differences between our model and the actual data are 0.47% and 0.36%. The maximum difference of the two is 1.15%. Thus, this model is believed to perform better at room temperature than at low temperature. Furthermore, a 4S1P battery pack is inspected at room temperature. The result is much alike that of 3S2P. The average energy differences between our model and the actual data are 0.30%, and the maximum difference is 0.76%. In the future, a more variety of charge data from different manufacturers, different configurations, and different operating temperatures will be examined to make our model more robust.
    關聯: 華岡工程學報 ; 27 期 (2011 / 01 / 01) , P141 - 147
    显示于类别:[工學院] 學報-華岡工程學報

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML171检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈