兩岸土地徵收合法性之比較研究—以公益性、比例原則與補償標準為中心

CCUR > College of Law > Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law > thesis > Item 987654321/28318

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/28318

Title:	兩岸土地徵收合法性之比較研究—以公益性、比例原則與補償標準為中心 A Study in Comparing the Legality of Land Expropriation on Two sides - to the Welfare, the Principle of Proportionality and Compensation Standards for the center
Authors:	林容羽 Lin, Rong-Yu
Contributors:	法律學系碩士在職專班
Keywords:	大埔案財產權保障財產權基本權制度性保障組織及程序保障財產權社會義務徵收公益性必要性比例原則正當法律程序補償
Date:	2014-06
Issue Date:	2014-09-30 16:21:08 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	國家建設發展需從人民手中取得土地，徵收是政府合法侵害人民財產標的之行為，此處所稱之法，必是指國會所制定之法律為限。立法機關因而制定土地徵收條例，作為國家合法侵害人民財產權之基礎，於土地徵收條例未規定之處尚需適用其他徵收之法律，若有細節所有相關徵收法律皆疏漏未加以規範，徵收機關即不得恣意為之。僅有出於絕對重大公共利益之事業且為不得已情況下，方可行使此種強烈之公權力作為最後手段。而徵收所欲達成之公益必須經過利益衡量後，認為有比被徵收財產權人私益更為重要，方可成為徵收之目的，且應予以合理之補償。需用土地人於申請徵收時，除應證明興辦事業已得法令許可，尚需舉辦公聽會，讓被徵收人及利害關係人有陳述意見之機會，並踐行協議價購等正當法律程序，以保障人民財產權，唯有政府嚴守法律之程序規定，方有可能落實憲法保障人民財產權之意旨。 National construction and development is required to obtain land from the people, the government imposed a legitimate subject of people's property infringement, alleged the law here is the law must be enacted by Congress is limited. Thus the legislature to develop land acquisition regulations, the people as a national legal basis for property rights infringement, the laws of other unspecified levied on land acquisition will take place regulations apply if all the relevant details are omissions not impose laws to regulate, agencies shall not impose wanton whom. Only the absolute major cause for the public interest and is under the last resort, be strong in the exercise of public authority such as a last resort. The charity must be fulfilled levied desired to measure the benefits that have been levied on the private interest is more important than the rights holder before becoming levied purpose, and should be reasonable compensation. When people need to use land expropriation in the application, in addition to setting up utilities has proved too Act permits still need to hold a public hearing to allow interested parties have the opportunity to state their opinion, such as due process of share price to protect the property rights of the people, only the government adhere the procedural requirements in legal, it is possible to implement the constitutional guarantee of parties intent of the people's property rights.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] thesis

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
fb140930162048.pdf		3561Kb	Adobe PDF	2081	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...