本研究旨在探討美容科輪調式建教班學生學習滿意度之現況，並探討各變相間的差異情形，進而瞭解不同個人背景變項、學校背景變項、店家背景變項之美容科輪調式建教班學生學習滿意度。
本研究以立意取樣的方式，選取台灣北、中、南、東共七所學校為主要研究對象，共收回601份有效問卷，以spss for windows(10.0)統計軟體，以次數分配、平均數、t考驗、單因子變異數分析，進行統計考驗。
研究結果顯示：
一、美容科輪調式建教班學生對學校之學習滿意度偏向滿意，但其中以「學校行政」面向滿意度最低，以「人際關係」面向滿意度最高。
二、美容科輪調式建教班學生對店家之學習滿意度偏向滿意，但其中以「薪資福利」面向滿意度最低，以「人際關係」面向滿意度最高。
三、不同學生個人背景變項對學校滿意度之差異情形中，以「年級」、「學習動機」二面向對變項有顯著差異。
四、不同學生個人背景變項對店家滿意度之差異情形中，以「年級」、「學習動機」二面向對變項有顯著差異。
五、不同學校背景變項對學校滿意度之差異情形中，以「學校所在區域」、有無「生涯規劃」二面向對變項有顯著差異。
六、不同學校背景變項對店家滿意度之差異情形中，以「學校所在區域」、有無「學習輔導」、有無「生涯輔導」三面向對變項有顯著差異。
七、不同店家背景變項對學校滿意度之差異情形中，以「入店方式」、「店家所在區域」、「工作時數」、「住宿環境」、有無「生活輔導」、「店家屬性」等面向對變項有顯著差異。
八、不同店家背景變項對學店家滿意度之差異情形中以「入店方式」、「店家所在區域」、「住宿環境」、有無「生活輔導」、「店家屬性」等面向對變項有顯著差異。
建議將來研究對象可擴及至美容業界，探討其實施的可能性；研究工具除了問卷之外，若再加入深入訪談，研究結果將更臻完善。
This study aims to examine the degree of Learning Satisfaction of the students from The Rotary Co-operative Education Program held at the Department of Cosmetology in Senior Vocational High School. The discrepancies created among the different parameters will be discussed in order to achieve an understanding on the degree of learning satisfaction from the rotary students of different parameters such as personal backgrounds, educational backgrounds, and work experiences or backgrounds.
Through Purpose Sampling 7 schools based in northern, central, southern and the eastern regions of Taiwan were selected as the main subjects of our research. In total 601 valid questionnaires were collected, and SPSS for Windows (10.0) was the software used for the statistical calculations. Frequency distribution, Mean Value, t-Test and One-way ANOVA were analyzed in this statistical test.
The study results are summarized in the following:
1. The Cosmetology students from the Rotary Co-operative Education Program tend to be satisfied overall with the learning satisfaction targeted at the schools. However among all the feedback it was found that the degree of satisfaction for “School Administrations” was relatively the lowest while “Interpersonal Relationships” scored highest in the degree of satisfaction.
2. The Cosmetology students from the Rotary Co-operative Education Program tend to be satisfied with the learning satisfaction targeted at the salons. However among all the feedback it was found that the degree of satisfaction for “Remuneration & Welfare” was relatively the lowest while “Interpersonal Relationships” scored highest in the degree of satisfaction.
3. “Grades” and “Purpose of learning” are the two factors that significantly affected the degree of satisfaction for the school among the students with different parameters in personal backgrounds.
4. “Grades” was the only factor that significantly affected the degree of satisfaction for the salons among the students with different parameters in personal backgrounds.
5. “Location of the School” and whether the school offers “Career Planning Programs” significantly affected the students’ degree of satisfaction for the school among the students with different parameters in educational backgrounds.
6. The degree of satisfaction for the salons among the students with different parameters in educational backgrounds, was significantly affected by “Location of the School” and whether the school offers “Assistance for Learning” & “Career Planning Programs”.
7. The degree of satisfaction for the school is affected by a few variants from the feedback from students with different salon background & experiences. The variants are “Method of Admission to the Salon”, “Location of the Salon”, “Working Hours”, “Accommodation Environment” and “Salon Type”.
8. The degree of satisfaction for the salon is affected by a few variants from the feedback from students with different salon background & experiences. The variants are “Method of Admission to the Salon”, “Location of the Salon”, “Accommodation Environment” and “Salon Type”.
It is in my opinion that the future research subjects can be extended to include the Cosmetics Industry and that the possibility of the implementation of such research can also be included in the discussion. Furthermore apart from using questionnaires as the only research tool, in-depth interviews should be included for research result that is better and more complete.
