文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/27806
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 47249/51115 (92%)
Visitors : 14509266      Online Users : 1210
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/27806


    Title: 錢穆「孔學」之思想研究──以《論語新解》為核心而開展
    The research of the thought of Quian Mu ’s Confucianism
    Authors: 許炎初
    Contributors: 哲學研究所
    Keywords: 錢穆
    錢賓四
    論語
    論語新解
    朱子
    Confucius
    Analects
    Confucianism
    Quien Mu
    New Interpretation of AnalectsGadamer
    The New Interpretation of Analects
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2014-08-14 10:06:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 錢穆對儒家學術思想的反省主要可以反應在他對孔子與《論語》的研究典範」與「學術類型」上。錢穆認為孔子與《論語》正是揭示一個完整的儒家學術原型與人格成德的典範。本文希望對錢穆「孔學」(並以《論語新解》為核心開展)的「研究典範」與「學術類型」提出較完整的評價,並對考察對當代中國學術思想的意義與啟發。
    本論文定位於「錢穆『孔學』之『思想』研究」。重點在討論錢穆其人其學的「基源問題」與作為其人其學核心處的「孔學」所體現的「研究典範」和「學術範型」。 本文並共分六篇逐一開展。一、【緒論篇】:討論本文的撰寫策略。二、【文獻反省篇】:考察當代中國學術思想對孔子與《論語》的遺忘。三、【治學方法篇】:將錢穆之學,定位於一個「述而不作」、「下學而上達」與「歷史文化哲學」的治學進路。四、【明體篇】:考察錢穆本《論語新解》的「本義學」所開展的「孔學」的體系。五、【辨相篇】:考察一個「孔子-朱子-錢穆」學脈論的成型。六、【評價篇】:考察錢穆「孔學」的意義、啟發、解題潛力。七、【結語篇】:指出錢穆「孔學」的永恆境界與後續、未盡之業。
    Quian Mu’ s reflection of academic research and method can mainly be shown in the field of the study of the Confucius and Analects. Quian Mu makes a claim that Confucius and Analects are the source of the academic paradigm and personality of the cultivation of Confucian school. This paper tries to manifest the main character of Quian Mu’ Confucianism to make a right judgment to show his valuable revelation to the academic development of modern Chinese thought.
    An inquiry into the research of the thought of Quian Mu ’s Confucianism is attempted in this paper. The purpose of this paper is to investigate Quian Mu ’s primordial Question and the meaning of the research method and academic paradigm based on the his Confucian philosophy especially based on New Interpretation of Analects.
    This Paper divides seven chapters:1. (Foreword):disclose the strategy of writing 2.(Reflection of Texts):to investigate the phenomena of the forgotten of Confucianism in Modern Chinese academic thought. 3.(Methodological approach):A transmitter and not a maker(「述而不作」), My studies lie low, and my penetration rises high(「下學而上達」), and “ history-culture-philosophy”(「歷史文化哲學」)4.(Fundamentality):from the extension of the original meaning of New Interpretation of Analects to the systemic unity 5.(Differentiation):investigate the possibility of academic context(Confucius-Chu His-Quian Mu)。6. (Evaluation):to investigate the meaning, revelation, and potentiality of problem-puzzling of Quian Mu’s Confucianism。7.(Conclusion):try to indicate the perennial scope of philosophy of Quian Mu’s Confucianism and the frescoing unfinished enterprises.
    Appears in Collections:[Philosophy Department and Graduate School] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback