不同技能水準與進攻位置的大專男子籃球選手對進攻模式前線索表現及預期能力之比較研究

CCUR > College of Kinesiology and Health > Graduate Institute of Sport Coaching Science > thesis > Item 987654321/27544

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/27544

Title:	不同技能水準與進攻位置的大專男子籃球選手對進攻模式前線索表現及預期能力之比較研究 The Comparison of Precue Availability and Anticipation Among Male Collegiate Basketball Players with Different Skill Level and the Offensive Positions
Authors:	曾意涵
Contributors:	運動教練研究所
Keywords:	技能水準進攻位置前線索前線索表現進攻模式預期能力中鋒組前線索領導人前鋒組攝影機
Date:	2006
Issue Date:	2014-06-20 14:59:11 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究主要目的在比較不同技能水準與進攻位置的大專男子籃球選手在進攻模式之不同時段前線索表現的差異；比較不同技能水準與進攻位置的大專男子籃球選手對於對手進攻模式之不同時段動作預期能力的差異。以60位參加全國大專男子籃球聯賽甲一級、甲三級校隊選手為受試對象，區分為優秀組與一般組、前鋒組與中鋒組。受試者面對數位攝影機拍攝進攻模式畫面，並剪輯成四個階段：從預備接球姿勢到受試者雙手接觸到球時、出手時、出手後50毫秒、出手後100毫秒。以時間遮蔽法讓受試者逐一觀看，以紙筆勾選預期其畫面為何種進攻模式。資料以二因子獨立樣本變異數分析處理，結果發現：一、優秀組的選手與進攻位置為前鋒的選手，其利用前線索訊息來預期對手進攻動作的能力，比一般組與進攻位置為中鋒的籃球選手要好。二、優秀組的選手與進攻位置為前鋒的選手，其前線索出現的訊息，比一般組與進攻位置為中鋒的選手少，較不容易被預期。這可能是因為優秀組的選手有接受正規的訓練，因此預期能力比一般組選手好、前線索曝露的情形也比一般組選手少；前鋒組選手是主控球賽進行的領導人，主要任務是運球和傳球，因此預期能力比中鋒組選手好、前線索曝露的情形也比中鋒組選手少。 The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in anticipation and precue availability among basketball players with different skill and the offensive positions. Participants were 60 male college players recruited from College Club Division Ⅰand Division Ⅱ basketball varsity. They were further classified as four groups, skill-excellent, skill-general, position-front and position-center. In front of camera, each player was recorded as four different phases. From preparing of the ball capture posture to the ball was touched by his hands was recorded as phase one, from preparing of ball capture posture to making a move was recorded as phase two, from preparing of the ball capture posture to 50 mini seconds behind making a move was recorded as phase three and from preparing of the ball capture posture to 100 mini seconds behind making a move was recorded as phase four. After recording, playing each taps which were masked off time stamps with four different phases to the participants of testing who should choose attacking model among provided models from questionnaire. We used tow independent random variables to make statistics. Results were found that : First, the skill-excellent and position-front group had better anticipated ability on attack model of competitors by using front clue than the other two groups players did. The skill-excellent and position-front group players had little front clue shown to their competitors when attacked. The reason could be a fine and regular training they had been through, so when attacked they have better front clue performance than others. The responsibilities of the front group players are normally higher than the others, because their major job is on moving and passing ball. That’s why they should own better anticipated ability and front clue performance.
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Sport Coaching Science ] thesis

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

View Licence

Loading...