文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/26556
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46962/50828 (92%)
Visitors : 12451350      Online Users : 607
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/26556


    Title: 不同學習風格大學生在電子書學習成效之研究
    The Learning Effect of E-Book on College Students with Different Learning Styles
    Authors: 黃馨誼
    Contributors: 資訊傳播學系
    Keywords: 學習風格
    認知負荷
    分段呈現
    Learning Style
    Segmenting
    Cognitive Load
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-01-21 14:10:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 因科技的日新月異,現今所邁入的數位學習時代,應要更注重於個人化的學習,重視每位學習者的學習風格並給予適合的教材。因此善用學習風格量表來了解每一位學習者的學習風格類型並給予適性化的教材,會影響到學習者的學習成效。

    本研究以Felder & Silverman學習風格之視覺型、語言型與認知負荷之分段呈現(segmenting)做結合,探討視覺型與語言型的何種分段呈現對學習者的學習成效最佳,以及對學習者認知負荷的影響。

    本研究依據動機與目的,並藉由文獻的整理與探討後,發展出研究的架構。本研究先使用學習風格問卷將學習者分類,並分別給予不同的教材,並利用電子書教材進行閱讀,並在學習者閱讀完教材後給予測驗卷以了解學習者閱讀完教材後學習的成效,並再給予認知負荷問卷。之後再進行數據與結果的分析。並預期學習者在閱讀完學習風格結合分段呈現或未分段呈現的教材後學習成效能有所提升。
    With rapid development of modern technology, digital learning should focus more on personalized learning. Instructional designers and instructors ought to pay more attention to each learner's learning style and provide appropriate materials. Providing adaptive materials according to learners’ learner styles will improve their learning performance.

    This study combined the visual/verbal learning style brought out by Felder & Silverman and segmenting from cognitive load theory to explore what kind of relation exists between learning style and segmenting in users’ learning performance and cognitive load perspectives.

    The study first classified participants according to Felder and Silverman’s learning style scale and provided different learning materials. Learners’ were asked to take pre-test before the treatment. After reading adaptive e-book materials, participants were given post-test, satisfaction questionnaire, and cognitive load questionnaire. The results showed that learners with verbal style performed better in the segmenting group while learners with visual style had similar scores in the segmenting and non-segmenting groups. Learners’ learning experience and cognitive load were also tested and discussed.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Information Communications & Graduate Institute of Information Communications ] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback