| 摘要: | 本研究目的在了解陰柔特質男性在性別偏見經驗中的復原力展現，採立意取樣邀請四位具陰柔特質、且曾因陰柔特質而遭受性別偏見的男性，進行半結構式的深度訪談，並以敘說研究作為資料分析的方式，一方面透過故事書寫了解個別研究參與者的性別偏見經驗與復原歷程，另一方面則以「類別-內容」的分析方式，找出性別偏見經驗對研究參與者的心理狀態影響與行為因應的相同與相異之處。
本研究結果發現如下：
一、研究參與者遭遇性別偏見的情境主要來自於學校、家庭與同志圈，其中包括同儕的性別偏見與不當對待、師長的性別偏見與不當處理、父母的性別偏見與不當對待、主流男性同儕團體會阻隔友誼關係之維繫與發展、男同志圈複製異性戀陽剛文化之機制。
二、在性別偏見經驗下，研究參與者的行為因應與行動策略包括「直接回應性別偏見的因應」、「防範性別偏見發生的策略」、「求助」與「重新解構理解」。
三、面對性別偏見與歧視，研究參與者有較多負面的情緒，包括對娘娘腔污名的憤怒、敏感外界性別偏見的眼光、擔心同志身份的曝光、厭惡自身的陰柔特質、對他人嘲笑辱罵的難過、友人旁觀漠視的無助感、以及厭煩外界的異樣眼光。
四、研究參與者在性別偏見經驗的復原歷程發展有四項特徵，分別是「早期的復原力發展在於危險因子的存在與強度」、「早期的保護因子強度影響自我強度」、「青少年時期成為多數人的高危險時期，男性同儕是共通的危險因子」與「進入成人階段後，多數危險因子下降；個別個案之認同狀態也不同」。
依據研究結果，針對陰柔特質男性、諮商實務工作者、教師與未來研究提供相關建議，並提出研究者的研究歷程省思。
The purpose of this study was to understand the resilience of sex prejudice for feminine male. Base on a semi-structured in-depth interview and narrative analysis method, the experience of four males who were suffered from sex prejudice because of their femininity were collected and analyzed. Not only individual experience of resilience in the context of sex prejudice would be explored in the literature but the effect of sex prejudice on individuals’ mental status and the homogeneity and difference of copying behavior between individuals would also be explored by means of “category-content” analysis.
The findings are as following:
1. The suffering from sex prejudice of feminine male mostly derives from schools, families and gay community, including sex prejudice and mistreatment of peers, improper handling and sex prejudice of teachers, sex prejudice and mistreatment of parents, and interpersonal frustration.
2. Depends on the experience of sex prejudice, the response and coping strategies of individual includes "direct response to sex prejudice", "strategies to prevent sex prejudice", "calling help" and "re-deconstruction".
3. Participants tend to have more negative emotions to sex prejudice and discrimination, such as being angry with sissy stigma, being sensitive to other’s sex prejudice, fearing of exposure of queer identity, disgusting with own femininity, feeling helpless, and being annoyed to other’s unusual judgment.
4. The process of the resilience of sex prejudice of participants reveals four features, such as “the development of the resiliency in early stage depends on the strength and existence of risk factors", "protective factors of early stage affects self strength", "adolescent stage becomes a high risky period for most participants, and male peers are risk factors in common", and “most of risk factors diminished in the adulthood stage, and the identity status between individuals is diverse".
According to the findings, suggestions to feminine male, counselors, teachers, and further studies were provided. Self-reflection of research process was also proposed in this study. |
