目的：探討台灣與日本柔道運動員訓練模式比較研究。研究對象：本研究以文化大學與天理大學柔道訓練為例（民國九十八年九月三日）至研究截止日（民國一百年十二月二十五日）止，以文化大學與天理大學柔道教練為對象，計有細川伸二監督、正木嘉美監督、鄭教練吉祥、廖教練俊強、天理大學兩位教練文化大學兩位教練共計四位教練。研究方法：文獻分析法及訪問法。結果：訪談結果得知台灣與日本柔道運動員訓練方式及其方法、訓練時間量、訓練環境、訓練條件)並無相差太遠，訓練的技術及學理亦無相差太遠、但選手自我管理及訓練量實行之徹底與否則影響其運動表現。有差異部分為選手未來出路，日本柔道選手約90%從事柔道專長相關工作、台灣選手從事柔道相關工作卻相當低，其可能是臺灣柔道選手對柔道專業不夠瞭解有關。
The objective of this study was to compare judo training mode between Japan (Tenri University) and Taiwan (Chinese Culture University). Mr. Hosokawa Shinji and Mr. Masaki Yoshimi in Tenri University, Japan and Mr. Cheng Chi Hsiang and Mr. Liao Chun Chiang in Chinese Culture University were interviewed. The results showed that the training approach, training methods, training time, training environment and training condition between these two universities were quite similar. Furthermore, no much differences between training technique and train theory. The main reasons of difference between performances were the self-control ability and thoroughly carry-out of the training workload assignment of Japanese Judo athletes. Besides, the expectations of the players between the two countries were different. The job opportunities between these two countries were different too. Contract to Taiwanese Judo players, about 90 percent of Japanese judo athletes were able to get their judo related job as they retired from their competitive career. The reason for the discrepancy of job opportunity probably was due to the disadvantage of Judo specialty of Taiwanese judo athletes.
