| 摘要: | 本研究就美國《紐約時報》與中國大陸《人民日報》對第十五次公約締約國大會（COP 15）的報導，進行敘述性統計及論域分析，以探究新聞體制與文化因素對新聞報導的影響。發現《紐約時報》因受調查新聞學及崇尚科學的文化傳統影響，報導主題以他國對氣候議題的看法、氣候變遷科學證據與後果為主。《人民日報》則因整合在政治科層組織之下，消息來源較少，同時亦受人情法則中「人際互動須做面子及拉關係」影響，偏好報導國際關係主題。
The article presents a cross-cultural comparison of newspaper coverage of COP
15 and global climate change in America and China as a case study to analyze their
ideologies. Based on the results of descriptive statistical analysis and discursive
analysis, the article demonstrates that the New York Times presented more viewpoints
of sources on the issue of COP 15 and global Climate Change than People’s Daily.
Furthermore, the New York Times delved more in the scientific evidence of global
climate change while People’s Daily focused more on international relations. These
findings show that different news regimes and cultures might have impacted the
direction of their media coverage. |
