本研究主要目的為：一、探討甲組選手知覺的家長式領導對情緒感受、團隊承諾及團隊凝聚力的影響；二、探討甲組選手的團隊承諾與團隊凝聚力之間的關係。本研究以大專甲組運動選手204位（男生116，女生88）為受試對象，平均年齡為20.26歲(SD=1.08)。本研究所用的研究工具有：家長式領導量表、情緒量表、團隊情境量表、團隊承諾量表。所收集的資料以多元逐步回歸分析及典型相關分析進行資料處理。本研究所得的結果如下：一、甲組選手知覺的家長式領導對情緒感受、團隊承諾及團隊凝聚力的預測：選手知覺教練的才德領導可預測正面情緒25%；威權領導可以有效預測負面情緒感受17%；威權領導與才德領導可以有效預測工具性承諾13%；才德領導可預測情感性承諾60%。才德領導可預測社會凝聚力18%；才德領導與威權領導可預測工作凝聚力16%。二、團隊承諾及團隊凝聚力的典型相關發現：甲組選手的團隊承諾透過兩個典型因素可以解釋團隊凝聚力總變異量的48.61%。最後，本研究根據上述的結果進行討論，並針對實際應用和未來研究方向提出一些建議。
The purposes of this study were: 1. to explore the effect of paternalistic leadership on emotional feeling, organizational commitment and team cohesion, 2. to explore the relationship between organizational commitment and team cohesion. There were 204 level Ⅰ and level Ⅱ college athletes (male 116, female 88) with a mean age of 20.26 (SD=1.08) used as the participants. The research instruments were Paternalistic Leadership Inventory, Emotional Feeling Inventory, Organizational Commitment Inventory and Team Cohesion Inventory. The collected data were analyzed by multiple stepwise regression analysis and canonical correlation analysis. The results were as following: 1. The prediction of level I athletes' perceived paternalistic leadership to emotional feeling, organizational commitment, and team cohesion: the moral leadership could predict positive emotional feeling; the authoritarian leadership could predict 17% of negative emotional feeling; the authoritarian and moral leadership could predict 13% of instrumental commitment; the moral leadership could predict 60% of affective commitment; the moral leadership could predict 18% of social cohesion; the moral and authoritarian leadership could predict 16% of task cohesion. 2. The canonical correlation between organizational commitment and team cohesion: the level I athletes' organizational commitment could explain 48.61% variance of team cohesion through two canonical factors. The findings were discussed and some suggestions for practical applications and future studies were offered.
