| 摘要: | 本研究主要目的在瞭解警察人員休閒參與和休閒阻礙之現況，並探討不同背景變項的警察人員休閒參與和休閒阻礙的差異情形，以及相互間的關係。本研究採問卷調查法，以國道公路警察局之警察人員為研究對象，取得有效問卷533份，分別進行描述性統計、t 檢定、單因子變異數分析、雪費事後比較、皮爾森積差相關、迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料分析。研究結論如下：
警察人員最常參與休閒活動前五項為「與家人共處」、「在家看電視」、「在家休息」、「閱讀書籍、報紙」、「泡茶聊天」；而「休閒阻礙」因素最高的前五項為：「放假不正常」、「休閒活動時的天氣狀況」、「時間不足」、「安全性」及「交通壅塞」。
教育程度、子女情況、休閒花費、服務年資、職務配階、職稱、服務地區等不同背景變項在「整體休閒參與」上有顯著差異。職稱背景變項在「整體休閒阻礙」上有顯著差異；職稱、職務配階在「個人內在阻礙」及職稱、服務地區在「人際阻礙」上亦達顯著差異。
警察人員之「整體休閒參與」和「整體休閒阻礙」呈現有顯著相關性。「整體休閒阻礙」對於「整體休閒參與」之迴歸模式效果顯著，「整體休閒阻礙」可以預測警察人員之「整體休閒參與」 0.8 % 的變異量。
希望透過本研究之結果，能提供警察人員、警政機關及後續研究之參考，對警察人員休閒生活層面有所助益。
The purpose of this study were to investigate the current situations of leisure participation and leisure constraints of policemen , and to explore the differences of different background variables in leisure participation and leisure constraints, and the relationship between leisure participation and leisure constraints. The study method was questionnaire survey. Taking National Highway policemen as the research objects, the researcher obtains 533 valid questionnaires. Statistical methods such as the descriptive statistics, T test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe'e post hoc comparison, Pearson’s product-moment correlation and regression analysis are adopted for data analysis. And the following conclusions have been reached:
The top five leisure activities most frequently participated by policemen were “with their families” , “ watching TV at home”, “rest at home”, “reading books, newspapers” , “chatting and Chinese tea party” while the top five leisure constraints were: “vacation timing is unusual”, “insufficient time”, “depends on the weather conditions”, “safety of activities”, “traffic jam”.
The factors of the education background, situation of children, leisure spending, advanced seniority, official rank, work's title and working place reveal the significant differences in leisure participation.The factors of the work's title reveal the significant differences in leisure constraints. The factors of the work's title and official rank reveal the significant differences in intrapersonal constraints. The factors of the work's title and working place reveal the significant differences in interpersonal constraints.
The relatlonship between“ leisure participation” and “ leisure constraints” has a significant relation. “Leisure constraints” has a significant indication for the predication of “ leisure participation”; and the indication index are 0.8 %.
It is hoped that this study could provide a useful reference for police institution, police constable and further research, hopefully to benefit the policemen's real life in entertainment and their off-duty relaxation gives suggestions. |
