資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/20990
|
| 題名: | Comparison of coplanar and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma |
| 作者: | Hsieh, CH (Hsieh, Chen-Hsi)
Liu, CY (Liu, Chia-Yuan)
Shueng, PW (Shueng, Pei-Wei)
Chong, NS (Chong, Ngot-Swan)
Chen, CJ (Chen, Chih-Jen)
Chen, MJ (Chen, Ming-Jen)
Lin, CC (Lin, Ching-Chung)
Wang, TE (Wang, Tsang-En)
Lin, SC (Lin, Shee-Chan)
Tai, HC (Tai, Hung-Chi)
Tien, HJ (Tien, Hui-Ju)
Chen, KH (Chen, Kuo-Hsin)
Wang, LY (Wang, Li-Ying)
Hsieh, YP (Hsieh, Yen-Ping)
Huang, DYC (Huang, David Y. C.)
Chen, YJ (Chen, Yu-Jen) |
| 貢獻者: | 運教所 |
| 關鍵詞: | PORTAL-VEIN-THROMBOSIS
INDUCED LIVER-DISEASE
3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY
LOCAL RADIOTHERAPY
CANCER STATISTICS
HEPATIC TOXICITY
TREATMENT PLANS
TUMOR THROMBUS
IRRADIATION
METASTASES |
| 日期: | 2010-12 |
| 上傳時間: | 2011-12-12 11:07:26 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | Background: To compare the differences in dose-volume data among coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), noncoplanar IMRT, and helical tomotherapy (HT) among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT).
Methods: Nine patients with unresectable HCC and PVT underwent step and shoot coplanar IMRT with intent to deliver 46 - 54 Gy to the tumor and portal vein. The volume of liver received 30Gy was set to keep less than 30% of whole normal liver (V30 < 30%). The mean dose to at least one side of kidney was kept below 23 Gy, and 50 Gy as for stomach. The maximum dose was kept below 47 Gy for spinal cord. Several parameters including mean hepatic dose, percent volume of normal liver with radiation dose at X Gy (Vx), uniformity index, conformal index, and doses to organs at risk were evaluated from the dose-volume histogram.
Results: HT provided better uniformity for the planning-target volume dose coverage than both IMRT techniques. The noncoplanar IMRT technique reduces the V10 to normal liver with a statistically significant level as compared to HT. The constraints for the liver in the V30 for coplanar IMRT vs. noncoplanar IMRT vs. HT could be reconsidered as 21% vs. 17% vs. 17%, respectively. When delivering 50 Gy and 60-66 Gy to the tumor bed, the constraints of mean dose to the normal liver could be less than 20 Gy and 25 Gy, respectively.
Conclusion: Noncoplanar IMRT and HT are potential techniques of radiation therapy for HCC patients with PVT. Constraints for the liver in IMRT and HT could be stricter than for 3DCRT. |
| 顯示於類別: | [運動教練研究所] 期刊論文
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 607 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
