| 摘要: | 中文摘要
海峽兩岸自1949至1987年長逹半世紀分隔而治，迄臺灣於1987年宣佈解嚴開放黨禁、報禁之後，隨即又開放人民赴大陸探親、旅遊及投資等，並於1992年 9 月實施「兩岸人民關係條例及其施行細則」，奠定兩岸民間交流之法源依據，嗣又開放片面「金、馬小三通」及兩岸相繼加入WTO（世貿組織），及迄至目前2010年兩岸又簽訂「經濟架構協議」（ECFA）、臺灣開放大陸學生可來臺就讀、有條件承認大陸學歷、臺灣之銀行可赴大陸城市設分行、及全面開放兩岸大三通（通商、通郵、通航）等，雙方人民交流日趨頻繁，前所未見。但兩岸政治體制相差甚鉅，雙方關係錯綜複雜，尤其兩岸通婚以來，衍生許多婚姻問題，使得我們對大陸婚姻制度需要更深入的研究與探討，以尋求因應之道。
兩岸之婚姻立法制定，因所宗主義不同，意識形態有別，於是，兩岸在不同環境下，各自形成並發展了相互差異的政治、經濟、社會及文化等各方面的制度，也決定了兩岸分別實行性質不同的法律制度，存在著不同的法律追求，因而在兩岸交流中，必然產生法制問題上的各種矛盾和衝突。故本文希冀能釐清兩岸婚姻法律衝突與實體適用，研究大陸婚姻法及相關司法解釋，以及比較兩岸婚姻制度之異同。
Abstract
Taiwan and China has been ruled separately from 1949-1987 for more than half a century older and rule. After the martial law been lifted, political party and newsletter restrict been broke in Taiwan in 1987, people visiting their relatives, tourists and investors were allowed to go to mainland China. The implementation of "The regulation of cross-strait people relations and enforcement rules" in September 1992 laid the legal basis of cross-strait civilian exchanges. Later on, "The mini-links of Kinmen, Matsu and Xiamen”, is open and followed by the entry to WTO of the two sides. Up to the current "Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement" (ECFA) signed by Taiwan and China in 2010, the approval for mainland students to study in Taiwan, conditional recognition of Mainland academic credits, branches of Taiwanese banks set in cities of mainland China, and the full liberalization of the three cross-strait direct links (trade, postal, air and shipping) and so on show the unprecedented frequent interflow and interaction between people of both sides. However, the difference between the cross-strait political system leading the immense complexity of the relationship, especially the derived marital problems since the liberalization of cross-strait marriages and force us to study the marriage regulation of mainland China to seek for the appropriate resolution.
Although there is a cross-strait marriage legislation, due to the different doctrine and ideologies, there are different aspects in political, economic, social and cultural formation and development due to the different environments of the two sides which also determines the different implementation of the legal system in two sides with different legal pursuit. Thus, within the cross-strait interactions, there would definitely be various inherent contradictions and conflicts of legal issues. So physical cross-strait conflict and applies and marital law and related judicial interpretations are expected to be clarified along with the comparison of similarities and differences of cross-strait marriages in this paper. |
