文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/20133
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46965/50831 (92%)
Visitors : 12755005      Online Users : 486
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/20133


    Title: 董事會結構指標、政府控制權與公營事業民營化後績效關聯性之研究
    Authors: 邱聖涵
    Contributors: 會計學系
    Keywords: 民營化
    控制權
    董事會結構
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2011-11-02 14:04:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國自1989年起推動公營事業民營化政策已具有顯著之成效,惟政府仍在中華電信、合作金庫、高雄銀行、陽明海運等七家事業董事會席次取得半數以上的席次,間接掌握已經民營化事業的決策,等同政府對該事業仍然具有控制權,且董監事具公股角色身分之不積極作為,也曾引發台肥、台開等弊案。本研究以2005年至2009年已完成民營化之上市公司為樣本,嘗試探討公司治理之董事會結構與企業經營績效之關係。
    實證結果顯示,政府在民營化事業董事會中仍具有控制權,對企業經營績效有負面的影響。董事會中政府席次未過半之企業的營業淨利雖呈顯著成長,但ROA及EPS則並未顯著改善。董事會結構程度良好之企業在淨利以及ROA上也皆有顯著成長。

    Since 1989, Taiwan has begun implementing the policy of privatizing its government-owned enterprises and had a significant effect. However, in around seven enterprises such as Chunghwa Telecom, Taiwan Cooperative Bank, Bank of Kaohsiung and Yang Ming Marine, the government still accounts for more than half of the board seats or supervisors of each enterprise. The government exercises indirect control over the decision making equate has domination of privatized enterprises. In addition, non-performance by directors and supervisors representing government shares has resulted in scandals in Taiwan Fertilizer, Taiwan Development, etc. The listed companies in Taiwan from 2006 to 2009 are sampled for this study to explore the association between corporate governance and operating performance of the privatized state-owned enterprises.
    The main results shows privatization of government control over the business with the board of directors on business performance have a negative impact. However. The government has less than half seats in board has significant growth in EBIT, but ROA and EPS were not significantly improved. The firm has high level in board structure also show significant growth in EBIT and ROA.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting & Graduate Institute of Accounting] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML379View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback