本研究旨在探討桌球運動傳統橫式握拍(R1握拍)與新式橫式握拍(R2握拍)，以八位國內優秀女子桌球選手為研究對象，其目的為：一、比較兩種不同角度桌球橫式握拍於正手拉前衝弧圈球時其擊球速度的運動學方式。二、比較兩種不同角度桌球橫式握拍於正手拉前衝弧圈球時其各動作分期關節、肢段之運動學參數。八名實驗參與者平均年齡18.25歲、身高160.5公分、體重55.4公斤。本研究採用Eva軟體將VAC軟體收集到的運動軌跡之現象，以 SPSS for Windows 11.0 版統計軟體處理，以相依樣本T檢定比較上述運動學參數兩者之間差異性，其研究結果發現：一、持R1握拍揮拍擊球期距離 0.36±0.03 公尺比持 R2 握拍側身引拍期終點距離 0.50±0.03 公尺距離短，達顯著差異(P＜.05)，由此得知，持 R2 握拍在拉前衝弧圈球時比持 R1 握拍擊球後的飛行距離速度較快。二、持 R1握拍擊球時拍形角度76.98±3.00度比持 R2握拍擊球時拍形角度68.77±0.92度角度較大，達顯著差異(P＜.05)，由此得知，持 R2 握拍在拉前衝弧圈球時比持R1 握拍擊球時的拍形角度較小，增加回球的隱密性，讓對手難以分辨來球的方向與落點，更具擊球的威力。三、持 R1 握拍擊球瞬間後球落至對方球檯之飛行時間為0.252±0.02秒，持 R2 握拍擊球瞬間後球落至對方球檯之飛行時間為0.236±0.02秒，達顯著差異(P＜.05)，由此得知，持R2 握拍比持 R1 握拍擊球瞬間後球落至對方球檯之飛行時間更快、更短且更具球威。以上研究獲得結果為持 R2 握拍擊球速度快、飛行時間短，且擊球時的拍形角度較小、隱密性高，擊球質量更具威力此研究結果在桌球技術表現是非常重要的發現，值得將新式橫式握拍(R2握拍)加以推廣與應用。
This study aimed to explore the traditional method of horizontal table tennis grip
(the R1 grip) and the new method of horizontal grip (the R2 grip) for eight national outstanding female table tennis players: which aimed for comparing the loop kinematic approaches of the ball-hitting speed for the angles of these two forehand- pull loop, and compared the stages of their kinematic parameters of the joints and limb segments. These eight contestants were averagely18.25 years and 160.5 cm and weighted 55.4kg. In this research, the EVA software adopted the trajectory phenomenon from the VAC software, used the SPSS for 6 Windows 11.0 software for statistical processing, and compared the differences between the above two kinematics parameters by the sample T-examination. The result showed that holding the R1 grip of batting swing distance from 0.36 ± 0.03 m was shorter than holding R2 grip sideways from 0.50 ± 0.03 m and reached the remarkable difference (P<.05), and that the R2 grip was faster than the R1 grip; secondly, holding the R1 grip when the bat hit the ball in an angle of 76.98 ± 3.00 was larger than holding the R2 grip when the bat hit the ball in an angle of 68.77 ± 0.92, had significant differences (P <.05), and revealed that the angle of holding the R2 grip on the ball loop pull was smaller than that of holding the R1 grip, increased the privacy of the ball, let the opponents feel it difficult to distinguish the direction and placement, and made the contestants more easily hit the ball; and thirdly, the ball of falling onto the other opponent’s table from the player holding the R1 grip : 0.252 ± 0.02 seconds and that from the player holding the R2 grip: 0.236 ± 0.02 seconds had significant differences (P <.05) and showed that the speed of the player by holding the R2 grip was faster and better than his holding the R1 grip. The above study of holding the faster and shorter R2 grip and its smaller angle, more privacy, and more power were very crucial to the technical performance of the table tennis and worth the promotion and the application.
