| 摘要: | 本研究論文係就以兩岸專利民事訴訟中，關於專利侵權鑑定的部分為主題。首先，以普通民事訴訟所涉及的一般侵權行為之主、客觀要件，以兩岸相關的學說、分類引申說明，接著針對專利侵權具備之要件與專利侵權之特殊性分別論述，藉以闡明專利侵權於民事訴訟中有其獨特性。
再就兩岸專利侵權鑑定基準之源起、規定分別羅列陳述；並於進行專利侵權鑑定時，對有關侵權鑑定之對象、流程等運作規範，參照美、日、歐洲等國家之處理方式或原則，其間之相似程度予以分析比較。然後，分別就兩岸專利侵權鑑定方法之步驟、判斷原則等，進行相對應以及差異性的比對，期能獲得更明確之認知。並且探討兩岸司法審理專利侵權案件之運作，依照所列舉相關實際的案例之分析，以驗證於法院內執行專利侵權鑑定、判斷之情況。
最後，期望以上述研究的內容，提供兩岸企業在專利權發生侵權訴訟時，如何快速的自我檢測、確認實際的侵害狀況，配合專業的代理律師，在公平、公正、合理情況下，以最有效、最符合經濟的方式快速消弭紛爭，使兩岸經濟交流活動正常化。
This research is subject to the Common Pleas of Patent Infringement, basing on the Judgment of the Cross Strait Patent Law. Firstly, entering to a case of general tort, by means of subjective and objective important conditions involved, related to the Taiwan Strait, we would like to introduce the related Theories and classifications on either side of the Cross Strait, then discuss the important and specific characteristics respectively, to be based on the Patent Infringement, in order to clarify the Patent Infringement with its unique character in a actions civil.
Secondly, we shall have the different Originations and Rules listed, referring to the judgment Criterions of the Patent Infringement on the Cross Strait; but also, at the time to proceed the Judgment of Patent Infringement, all the Objects and Operating Specifications of the Infringement Judgment ought to be regulated, complying with the patterns and principles in the United States, Japan, European countries, etc. Any degree of consistency among it should be analyzed and compared. Afterwards, it’s either functional procedures methodologies of Patent Infringement Judgment, comparing the relativity and differences of each other, to obtain more specific knowledge about it. Moreover, to probe Cross Strait for an operation of judicial trying of Patent Infringement Judgment, citing those relevant practical cases illustrated could test and verify the Patent Infringement well executed in the Courts.
Finally, we do expect to extend the contents of this Study, providing all the enterprises on both sides to deal with any Patent Infringement occurred, how to have a quickest self detection and recognition of the hurting situation in fact, combined with a Professional Lawyer, to be kept in a fair, justice and reasonable circumstances, to eliminate conflicts in a quicker way of the most effective and economical solution. It is good to have Normalization of the Economic Exchanging Activities across the Taiwan Strait. |
