文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/19013
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46965/50831 (92%)
Visitors : 12767832      Online Users : 318
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/19013


    Title: 從兩岸關係的變遷探討兩岸關係的定位(下)
    Authors: 邵宗海
    Contributors: 史學系
    Keywords: 兩岸變遷
    兩岸定位
    分裂國家理論
    僵持遊戲理論
    囚徒困境遊戲理論
    少數民族主義
    大型民族主義
    Date: 2004-01
    Issue Date: 2011-01-24 15:15:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 兩岸關係的變遷與定位,是本文研究的重點。對於兩岸變遷的探討,主要是希望藉著各個不同階段的分類來認識兩岸的互動情況。由於兩岸的變遷不盡然只由歷史研究途徑作為唯一解讀的管道,因此也設法藉由西方理論模式的運用來解析兩岸變遷的過程。其次,對於兩岸定位的分析,則以一些過去兩岸所浮現出的現象為區分標準。希望藉此了解,兩岸當局對雙方關係在變遷過程當中,因呈現不同的內涵給予彼此不同的定位後,進而再來延伸出兩岸關係整個定位的結論。由於本文是從「變遷」的探討去從事「定位」的分析,因此「變遷」與「定位」還是有點區分:「變遷」只是一種現象的描述,而「定位」則是一種「法定或事實」的描述。所以變遷與定位的觀點當然會有關聯,但不是必然的互動結果。
    The main research to this article is concentrating on reviewing what the historic developments and the political definition of Cross-Strait relations have been changed since 1949. As to the discussion of Cross-Strait developments, the author hopes mainly to realize the interactions between Taipei and Beijing through the classification of the different stage from 1949 to the present. However, the historical approach is not the only method to analyze of Cross-Strait developments, and the western theories are thereby applied to the analysis. Then, the status of the political definition settled by Taipei and Beijing to each other cannot be ignored. This author tries to find how the both sides of Taiwan Strait give a proper status to each other through the different period. Of course, the emphasis on this article is at first in search of the historic changes then turns to the discussion of the political definition. Surely, there is distinguish between the historic development and political definition: "When the historic development is considered as the description of phonemics, the political definition can then be modified as a state under the regulation by law or fact." The both may be connected in some ways, but they are not an inevitable outcome of their interactions.
    Relation: 遠景基金會季刊 5卷1期 P.95-123
    Appears in Collections:[Department of History-Graduate School] journal articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML124View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback