文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/16257
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 46962/50828 (92%)
造訪人次 : 12457516      線上人數 : 630
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於CCUR ‧ 管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/16257


    題名: 從語詞的搭配觀點探討本國大學生使用英文同義字之研究
    作者: 劉振蘋
    貢獻者: 英國語文學系
    關鍵詞: synonym
    collocation
    verb
    adjective
    日期: 2010
    上傳時間: 2010-09-03 15:49:56 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 從語詞的搭配觀點探討本國大學生使用英文同義字之研究摘要本計劃為期一年，是研究台灣大學生使用英文同義字寫出搭配詞的能力，同時也研究大學生不會寫、或寫出不恰當的同義字搭配詞之原因。參與本研究的受測學生，為一百二十名來自不同年級、不同科系的大學生。測試工具為六十題含有同義字搭配詞的句子，共分兩個部份，第一部份以refuse 及reject的搭配詞為主。第二部份以quick及fast的搭配詞為主。根據朗文的字典Longman Web Dictionary及搭配詞搜尋引擎JustTheWord所提供的資訊，refuse、reject、quick及fast四字的常用搭配詞類型如下：refuse 有三種語法搭配：(1) refuse (v) + N (2) refuse to + V (3) refuse + somebody + something。Reject有二種語法搭配：(1) reject + N (2) reject + N1 + as + N2。Quick 和fast 的語法搭配為 quick/fast + N。同義字之搭配詞測驗完成後，從受測者當中，隨機選出成績優良、普通、和不佳的學生各十名，進行個別訪談，以瞭解受測者在受測時(一)對同義字及同義字之搭配詞所具有的概念，(二)在寫出同義字之搭配詞時所使用之策略。理論上來說，本計畫之研究，(一)將有助於我們了解台灣大學生能寫出那些恰當的、不恰當的與動詞同義字 refuse、reject並用的語義、語法搭配詞、與形容詞同義字 quick、fast並用的語義搭配詞，以及各類型的頻率分佈；(二) 可讓我們從不同角度 (即第二語本身的、跨語言的、及心理語言的角度)探索台灣大學生不會寫、或寫出不恰當的同義字搭配詞之原因；(三)有助於我們瞭解各種與動詞同義字refuse、reject並用的語義、語法搭配詞，與形容詞同義字quick、fast並用的語義搭配詞就應用方面而言，本研究強調以「成語優先原則」(idiom principle)為本、重視字詞搭配的語言觀 (一)盼能讓教師了解不要太側重以「自由選擇原則」( open-choice principle)為本的傳統語言觀；(二) 希望教師能在程中加入同義字搭配詞的學習單元，以增強學生使用英文慣用語的能力，並知道如何具體幫助學生習得各種同義字搭配詞；(三)能讓學生有機會學習使用搭配詞搜尋引擎找到恰當的同義字搭配詞；(四)可激發更多有關英文慣用語的研究，幫助字典編籑者能早日編出更好的同義字典，將常用的同義字搭配詞收入字典中；(五)可提醒教科書的作者考慮將同義字搭配詞編入適當的章節中。
    A Study of Taiwanese University Students’ Production of Collocations of English Synonyms Abstract The purpose of the one-year study is to investigate the competence of Taiwanese university students in producing English collocations of verb synonyms and adjective synonyms as well as the causes of their difficulty in producing them. A gap-filling collocation test of sixty questions will be given to one hundred and twenty university students from different majors to elicit collocations of verb synonyms refuse and reject as well as collocations of adjective synonyms of quick and fast. The test contains two parts: the first focuses on the collocations of refuse and reject; the second part deals with the collocations of quick and fast. The syntactic structures of refuse, reject, quick, and fast are based on the patterns of the combinations (i.e., collocations) provided by Longman Web Dictionary and JustTheWord, a collocation search engine. The syntactic structures for refuse are: (1) refuse (v) + N (2) refuse to + V (3) refuse + somebody + something. The syntactic structures for reject are: (1) reject + N (2) reject + N1 + as + N2. The syntactic structure for quick and fast is: quick/fast + N. After the collocation test, an individual retrospective interview will be conducted to thirty randomly chosen participants, ten from each proficiency level, to collect information about the participants’ knowledge of synonyms, their concept regarding collocations of synonyms, their strategy use in choosing the “right” synonym in producing a collocation. Theoretically, it will contribute to our understanding of (a) Taiwanese university students’ competence in producing acceptable English collocations of the verb synonyms refuse and reject and those of the adjective synonyms quick and fast; (b) the major L2 linguistic, cross-linguistic, and psycholinguistic factors that lead to the production of the acceptable and unacceptable forms of learner collocations of refuse and reject, quick and fast. (c) the various forms, meanings, and uses of the English collocations of verb synonyms refuse and reject and of adjective synonyms quick and fast. Practically, the findings of the study will (1) make teachers realize the need to shift some of our emphasis from the traditional view of language, which is based on the open-choice principle, to the collocationist model of language, which is based on the idiom principle; (2) help EFL teachers become more aware of the need to teach collocations of synonyms in order to improve learners’ competence in using idiomatic English; (3) help EFL teachers know how to deal with learners’ problems in learning collocations of synonyms and help EFL learners know how to use collocation search engines to find the right collocations of near synonyms; (4) trigger more research on the idiomatic use of English and eventually motivate the lexicographers to compile a better dictionary of synonyms that provides us with useful information of the collocational behaviors of synonyms; (5) will make the textbook writers understand the strong need for more learning materials on various types of collocations of synonyms.
    顯示於類別:[英文系所] 研究計畫

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    992410H034.pdf599KbAdobe PDF1062檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML549檢視/開啟


    在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋