| 摘要: | 本論文之研究主題為「從嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎之流行探究我國勞動法制之因應與建議」，並以因應現下疫情狀況所制定的「防疫照顧假」為例作為探討議題的起點；以文獻分析、比較研究法等方式，希冀能理解我國對於防疫照顧假之制定歷程、緣由與其所期望產生的實務成效，進而深入探討其對我國勞動條件、及勞雇關係間所帶來之影響，並透過與他國防疫現況及措施之比較，找出可做為參考之優點。希望本篇論文能成為未來我國再次面對特殊傳染病時，欲修改或增設勞工權益時，得做為參考之有價值文章。
本篇論文之架構，分為五章：第一章的內容為緒論，說明本文撰寫的研究動機與目的，並針對本文的研究範圍作出界定，說明各章節欲撰寫之內容架構。最後則是說明本文採用的研究方法，以及資料的蒐集來源。
第二章會針對「防疫照顧假」此一新生法律概念，從其立法上之基礎做解釋及定義，並對其他相關勞工之基本權利及實務運用之各種假別進行解釋及探討。
第三章為防疫照顧假之運作狀況及困境，首先將從防疫照顧假之運作為出發，觀察我國現行法制對於防疫照顧假之相關規範；再著墨於落實上所延伸的困境難題。而本章針對防疫照顧假作為主要的討論重點，細部將分成兩項要點討論：雇主之給假義務，及雇主之給薪義務。另外也會針對現在實務上，防疫期間所採取之居家辦公所衍生出的其他法律問題進行討論。
第四章將從SARS抗疫經驗論起，以祈作為研究及參考借鏡；再輔以中國大陸過往及現今對於防疫災情上之應變措施、法律規範等，做文獻資料上的蒐集彙整，並將其納入本章作為討論的範圍。
第五章是結論，將會總結前述各章節之討論內容。著眼於對勞雇雙方都能帶來益處的修法構想，期許透過本篇論文的撰寫，能為我國未來的修法帶來一些新想法構思及助益。
Entitled “A Study on the Response and Suggestion under Labor Standards Act from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19),” we discussed the epidemic prevention childcare leave policy established in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Through literature analysis and comparative research, we attempted to determine the development process of, the reasons for, and expected implementation results of Taiwan’s epidemic prevention childcare leave, thereby delving into the effect of said statutory benefit on labor conditions and labor–employment relations. Comparisons were made between Taiwan and other countries’ epidemic prevention status quo and measures to identify advantages that can be used as references. Findings of this study may hold reference value for the Taiwanese government in revising and establishing labor rights in response to subsequent emergences of novel communicable diseases.
This paper comprises into five sections. The first section, the Introduction, explains the research motivation and objectives as well as defines the research scope, briefing the content structure of each section. The end of this section details the research methods adopted and the data collection sources.
The second section explains and defines the new legal concept of epidemic prevention childcare leave based on its legislative basis. The basic labor rights and practical applications of other relevant leaves are also explained and discussed.
The third section details the implementation and dilemma of epidemic prevention childcare leave. Firstly, the implementation of epidemic prevention childcare leave is discussed to examine how Taiwan’s current legal system regulates said statutory benefit. Subsequently, dilemmas encountered during policy implementation and the relevant problems derived are addressed. Centering on epidemic prevention childcare leave, the discussion is further divided into two major topics, namely the employer’s obligation to provide leaves and to pay wages. Lastly, other legal issues arising from working from home as a preventive measure during the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.
The fourth section begins by detailing Taiwan’s experience in combatting against the SARS epidemic, which may serve as references for this study. To expand the scope of discussion, we also collected and organized literature on China’s response measures and regulations related to epidemic prevention in the past and present.
Section five, the Conclusion, sums up the discussions in the preceding sections. Focusing on the idea of law revision to benefit both employers and employees, we hope to introduce innovative thoughts, ideas, and benefits achievable through future law revisions. |
