婚姻家庭權是我國憲法保障的基本權利，同性婚姻無法與異性婚姻享有法律上相同的地位，經過30多年的婚姻平權運動，在大法官釋憲、全民公投然後依據公投結果制定專法，同性伴侶終於可以結婚了，台灣成為亞洲第一個以法律保障同性婚姻的國家。
然而大法官解釋漏未解釋的部分讓未來同性婚姻法制化的過程增添許多爭議。
本文從同性婚姻法制化所會面臨的挑戰和同性婚姻法制化的爭議問題還有同性婚姻立法模式的爭議，三個面向來探討我國同性婚姻在大法官釋字第748號解釋的引領下是否真的能實現我國同性伴侶所盼望的婚姻平權的盼望。
Marriage and family rights are the basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of China, however, same-sex marriages cannot enjoy the same legal status as heterosexual marriages. After more than 30 years of marriage equality movement, the Grand Justice finally made decisive interpretation that non-recognition of same-sex marriages should be unconstitutional. After a fierce Referendum a specific law for the enforcement of the Grand Justice Interpretation No. 748 has been adopted and same-sex couples can finally get married Taiwan became the first country in Asia to guarantee same-sex marriage by law.
However, Justice Interpretation and the Enforcement Law remain a number of controversies in the future legalizing process of same-sex marriages.
This article focuses on the challenges faced by the legalization of same-sex marriages and the controversial issues in the legalization of same-sex marriages, as well as the disputes on the same-sex marriage legislation model, with the hope to clear whether the Interpretation can satisfy the expectations of the same-sex couple for the marriage equality.
