English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 47126/50992 (92%)
造訪人次 : 13845227      線上人數 : 226
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CCUR管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/48402


    題名: 2016-2018年柔道規則改變對於黃金得分之影響 -以日本大滿貫賽為例
    The Impact of 2016-2018 Judo Rules Changes on the Golden Score-Take the Japan Grand Slam As an Example
    作者: 曾昌盛
    貢獻者: 體育學系運動教練碩博士班
    關鍵詞: 延長賽
    致勝得分技術
    致勝得分等級
    致勝時間
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2020-08-17 14:53:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 目的:分析2016-2018年日本大滿貫賽進入黃金得分之賽程中,致勝時間、致勝得分技術及致勝得分等級的分布差異狀況。方法:將三年的比賽各分為一組,2016年進入黃金得分共26場;2017年進入黃金得分共106場;2018年進入黃金得分共92場作為研究對象,統計方法以描述性統計與卡方檢定,顯著水準訂為p<.05。結果:1.在致勝時間方面以進入黃金得分0-1分鐘致勝為最多,占42%。2.致勝技術得分等級方面:立技與寢技在差異比較中,2016年與2017年的卡方值為19.048,具有顯著差異。2017年與2018年的卡方值為0.796,無顯著差異。2016年與2018年的卡方值為14.943。具有顯著差異;3.致勝得分等級方面以對手被判罰犯規致勝為最多占41%,其次是一勝占33%。在差異比較中,2016年與2017年的卡方值為4.313,無顯著差異。2017年與2018年卡方值為10.799,具有顯著差異。2016年與2017年的卡方值為18.081,有顯著差異。結論:本研究結果顯示2016-2018年日本大滿貫賽進入黃金得分之賽程中,致勝時間偏向於在進入黃金得分後1分鐘內;在致勝得分技術中,皆以立技獲勝為主,立技之中又以足技最多;致勝得分等級方面,皆以因對方犯規致勝為主,其次為一勝。根據本研究結果可以得知,2016-2018年日本大滿貫賽進入黃金得分的場次2017年以後不減反增,黃金得分的致勝方式也明顯是因為對方犯規而獲勝,因此進入黃金得分在戰術上就很重要了,如果要用技術得分致勝的話,就要把握立技的攻擊。
    Objective: The purpose of the study was to analyze the difference in the distribution of scoring time, scoring techniques, and scoring levels in the 2016-2018 Japan Grand Slam entering the golden score schedule. Method: Dividing the three-year games into a group, entering the Golden Score in 2016, a total of 26; entering the Golden Score in 2017,a total of 106; entering the Golden Score in 2018, a total of 92, as the research object, the statistical method uses description and Chi-square test, the significance level is set to p <.05.The results of the study: (1) In terms of scoring time, the golden score of 0-1 minute to win is the most, accounting for 42%. (2) The score of scoring techniques: Because of the small amount of data, it is only divided into Nage-waza and Katame-waza. In the difference, the Chi-square value in 2016 and 2017 is 19.048, which is a very significant difference. The Chi-square value for 2017 and 2018 is 0.796, there’s no significant difference. The Chi-square value for 2016 and 2018 is 14.943. There’re very significant differences. (3) In terms of scoring levels, the opponent is awarded a foul to win up to 41%, followed by a win accounting for 33%. In the comparison of differences, the Chi-square value for 2016 and 2017 is 4.313, no significant difference. The Chi-square value in 2017 and 2018 is 10.799, which is significantly different. The Chi-square value for 2016 and 2017 is 18.081, which is significantly different. Conclusion: The results of the study show that in the 2016-2018 Japan Grand Slam entering the golden score, the scoring time is biased within 1 minute after entering the golden score; in the scoring techniques, all of them are based on winning with skill. Among the skills, foot skills are the most. In terms of scoring levels, they are mainly due to the opponent's foul, the second reason is one win. According to the results of this study, it can be seen that the number of golden score in the 2016-2018 Japan Grand Slam did not decrease but increase after 2017, and the way to win the golden score is obviously because the opponent’s fouled, so entering the golden score is tactical. It is very important if you want to use techniques to win, you must grasp the attack of the Nage-waza.
    顯示於類別:[運動教練研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML151檢視/開啟


    在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©  2006-2025  - 回饋