| 摘要: | 研究目的：主要探討企業男子排球聯賽四支隊伍得失分成效隊比賽勝負之影響。方法：本研究以排球企業聯賽七年男子組上下球季所有對戰場次共 30 場，透過中華排球協會官網取得全年球季攻守紀錄表，並以 SPSS 20.0統計套裝軟體分析描述性統計和單因子變異數分析，分析攻防技術差異。利用多元逐步迴歸分析探討影響比賽總得分與得分技術隊勝負技術之關係。結果顯示：台電隊、美津濃隊、貫一隊、國訓隊各項主要得分技術排序為攻擊得分、對方失誤得分、攔網得分、發球得分。攻擊得分技術排名為台電隊、美津濃隊、貫一隊、國訓隊。攔網得分技術排名為美津濃隊、台電隊、貫一隊、國訓隊。發球得分排名為美津濃隊、台電隊、貫一隊、國訓隊。對方失誤得分排球依序為美津濃隊、台電隊、國訓隊、貫一隊。由總勝分排名冠軍為台電隊、亞軍為美津濃隊、季軍為貫一隊、殿軍為國訓隊。多元逐步迴歸分析後，最具獲勝的關鍵因素為攻擊得分，其次是對方失誤得分，第三個因素為攔網得分。結論：經由此次研究後，台電、美津濃兩隊實力比較能抗衡，而貫一隊、國訓隊技術的掌握性缺乏穩定度，應在日後訓練中，加強主動得分技術與戰術的成熟度，希望能在企業排球聯賽中有優異的成績表現。
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences and effects of score and non-score skills among four teams (Taiwan Power, Mizuno, Kuan-Yi, and National Training Center) in competitions. Methods: In present research, a total of 30 matches of the seventh-year annual league game records were analyzed which were acquired from the website of Chinese Taipei Volleyball Association (CTVBA). The statistical software SPSS 20.0 for window was used to analyze. Descriptive statistics and One-way ANOVA were applied to examine the score and non-score skills among teams. And multiple stepwise regression method was applied to explore the relationship between total scores and scoring techniques. Result: The results were shown below: 1. The sequences of scoring techniques of four teams were spiking scores, opponent errors scores, serving scores, and blocking scores. In spiking scores, the sequences of the teams were Taiwan Power, Mizuno, Kuan-Yi, and National Training Center. In blocking scores, the sequences of the teams were Mizuno, Taiwan Power, Kuan-Yi, and National Training Center. In serving scores, the sequences of the teams were Mizuno, Taiwan Power, Kuan-Yi, and National Training Center. In opponent errors scores, the sequences of the teams were Mizuno, Taiwan Power, National Training Center, and Kuan-Yi. The total scores reveled that Taiwan Power was the champion; Mizuno was the first runner-up; Kuan-Yi was the second runner-up; National Training Center was quartus. 2. According the results of multiple stepwise regressions, the key points of victory or defeat were spiking scores, opponent errors scores, and blocking scores. Conclusion: It was evenly matched adversaries between Mizuno and Taiwan Power. However, the National Training Center and Kuan-Yi performed unstable comparing with the others. They should improve the scoring skills and combinations by further trainings to enhance the achievement. |
